I see this proposal as well fitted and perfectly timed for what FRAX already has in place, in terms of tech, and currently is looking for, in terms of solutions to grant more security at scale.
From the words of @samkazemian himself:
Please understand the fact that:
1 - The idea of covering the protocol’s liabilities with lending was given out for free, I’ve been and I currently am, working on this model for free and open sourcing my work and though process both here, on Twitter and in the Official Telegram chat.
2 - Requesting an FXS denominated grant as a form of compensation for DAO collaboration isn’t an unusual practice as you can see for this other recent proposal:
The compensation would allow me to keep my interests aligned and my full focus oriented towards the continuous development of the proposed economic model.
I feel and I think, the most important thing is that the amount of value created for the community far outweights that of the compensation.
In this regard, to judge whether this is the case or not, is completely put back into the hands of the community itself.