# Implement VST/Frax ragequit function with fee

**URL:** <https://gov.frax.finance/t/implement-vst-frax-ragequit-function-with-fee/2761>\
**Category:** Gauges\
**Created:** [November 18, 2023, 1:01am UTC](https://gov.frax.finance/t/implement-vst-frax-ragequit-function-with-fee/2761 "2023-11-18T01:01:32Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![0xChuckbeard](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/gov.frax.finance/0xchuckbeard/32/1342_2.png) [@0xChuckbeard](https://gov.frax.finance/u/0xChuckbeard)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2023, 1:01am UTC](https://gov.frax.finance/t/implement-vst-frax-ragequit-function-with-fee/2761/1 "2023-11-18T01:01:32Z")

</div>

I propose we reintroduce the topic to rage quit from the Arbitrum VST/Frax LP given Vesta Finance is unwinding and their website will only be online to redeem VST for USDC until 10/17/2024 . Prior vote failed with a 0% fee. I am not sure what the best fee would be given this pool, although seems like 20% is what most other rage quits have proposed - and compared to losing funds - this seems reasonable. If anyone has any other sophisticated reasons why this fee should be otherwise I’d love to hear it, but would hate to have all the funds in this LP lost due to inaction. Thanks for any suggestions/discussion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![0xChuckbeard](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/gov.frax.finance/0xchuckbeard/32/1342_2.png) [@0xChuckbeard](https://gov.frax.finance/u/0xChuckbeard)\
**Post date:** [November 26, 2023, 5:33pm UTC](https://gov.frax.finance/t/implement-vst-frax-ragequit-function-with-fee/2761/2 "2023-11-26T17:33:49Z")

</div>

I suppose if there is no recommendation either way from the community then I’d go ahead with the 20% fee

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![nader.frax](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/gov.frax.finance/nader.frax/32/1849_2.png) [@nader.frax](https://gov.frax.finance/u/nader.frax)\
**Post date:** [November 27, 2023, 6:39pm UTC](https://gov.frax.finance/t/implement-vst-frax-ragequit-function-with-fee/2761/3 "2023-11-27T18:39:50Z")

</div>

You can use this proposal as a template :

> [@\[FIP - 280\] Implement Saddle L2D4 Gauge ragequit function with 20% fee](https://gov.frax.finance/t/fip-280-implement-saddle-l2d4-gauge-ragequit-function-with-20-fee/2528):
>
> Authors Frax Core Team Summary Implement Saddle L2D4 Gauge ragequit function with a 20% fee. Background and Motivation The Saddle L2D4 pool was a popular stable pool on Arbitrum, contributing to liquidity provision and stablecoin swaps. However, the recent approval of [SIP-54](https://vote.saddle.community/#/proposal/0x271aef6b1d04cf08878b33d304add4827da146dc7b1ca12d802a3922e29ad34b) on August 14, 2023, which decided to responsibly wind down the Saddle protocol, leads to a reevaluation of the operational aspects of the Saddle L2D4 pool. In light of these developments, this proposal seeks to introduce …

Let me know if you have any questions about it.