# TOKEMAK C.O.R.E.3 Voting

**URL:** <https://gov.frax.finance/t/tokemak-c-o-r-e-3-voting/1269>\
**Category:** Miscellaneous\
**Created:** [April 26, 2022, 3:55am UTC](https://gov.frax.finance/t/tokemak-c-o-r-e-3-voting/1269 "2022-04-26T03:55:09Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mark11](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/gov.frax.finance/mark11/32/21_2.png) [@Mark11](https://gov.frax.finance/u/Mark11)\
**Post date:** [April 30, 2022, 2:25am UTC](https://gov.frax.finance/t/tokemak-c-o-r-e-3-voting/1269/21 "2022-04-30T02:25:05Z")

</div>

This is essentially the case for not doing what you propose - because we potentially end up with nothing and our partner fails to get a reactor

> [@sparkes25](#):
>
> last time we put our full support behind 1 protocol and offered bribes to get other voters involved, and it still failed to make the top 5 by a wide margin.

OTC bribes at a discount for partners is the wei for win and help win

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sparkes25](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/gov.frax.finance/sparkes25/32/392_2.png) [@sparkes25](https://gov.frax.finance/u/sparkes25)\
**Post date:** [May 1, 2022, 11:27pm UTC](https://gov.frax.finance/t/tokemak-c-o-r-e-3-voting/1269/22 "2022-05-01T23:27:36Z")

</div>

i dont agree, i think a protocol is far more likely to get a reactor if it already has a lot of votes, we put our full support behind it and the protocol we vote for has already shown it is interested in getting a reactor.

i dont see how charging the protocol for our votes makes it more likely they will get one and doing OTC deals makes it less likely because this wont help them get other voters to add their votes too.

not that it really matters now, because i cant put this up for vote anyway.

[Previous page](https://gov.frax.finance/t/tokemak-c-o-r-e-3-voting/1269.md?page=1)